for my Policy and Communications Workshop we all wrote Op-Eds on something we were studying. so i did mine on something we visited in brazil. here it is, read it. let me know what you think about it. post a comment. suggestions and constructive criticism are encouraged and desired. thanks!
Rethinking Sustainability in the Amazon
Dan Becker, January 15, 2009
In 1999 ALCOA-the American Aluminum company based in Pittsburg, PA-purchased the rights to begin bauxite mining in Juruti, a township in Pará, the second largest state of the Brazilian Amazon. The world’s leading producer of aluminum, the eventual product of bauxite, ALCOA abides by a series of environmental impact studies, regulations on climate monitoring and wildlife conservation, and social service provisions. The company has recently been internationally recognized for their commitment to sustainability and the construction of the sustainable mining site in the region. However, how does this explain the disruption of ecosystems and near-unanimous social unrest in Juruti?
The communities of Juruti rest alongside tributaries of the Amazon, the largest and most biologically diverse river in the world, home to over 3,000 recognized species of fish. Inhabitants of Juruti have traditionally made their livelihoods based on agricultural subsistence and small-scale fishing to feed their villages and families. With the arrival of the mining project, these traditional-use areas became off-limits to Juruti’s communities, greatly restricting their access to all that the biodiverse forest and rivers provide. In addition to being cut away from traditional sources of income and basic amenities, residents fear that ALCOA’s rinsing of bauxite ore in the township’s waters will pour sediments into the main lake and drastically alter the water’s composition.
Pumping roughly 5,000 liters of water per hour for the mining operation, ALCOA is showing signs that the company does not understand nor give much credit to understanding the local ecology of the region. In Juruti, the primary water systems are composed of highly acidic black-water. Due to the decay of vegetation as it moves through the flooded forests, varzeas, the water takes on a dark-colored tint and is generally lower in nutrients than other water systems. Yet because of these conditions, black-water contains a unique array of flora and fauna. ALCOA’s bauxite extraction is in the process of extracting the water from this system and replacing it with white water from other sources made of an entirely different composition, drastically altering the environment and the community’s source of fish and drinking water.
While ALCOA has strutted a commitment to sustainability in their extraction sites, these areas remain just that, a source of profit. Social movements in Juruti stress the desire for a share in the monetary gain, inclusion in the project, and access to their traditional lands. The company’s record of their involvement and participation with the communities they extract from is dismal. Juruti is only one small area where communities’ ecosystems and connection with the resource management process are dictated by ALCOA. In 1963 ALCOA’s building of a dam in Suriname flooded nearly 600 meters squared of forest and displaced over 6,000 individuals, who received only $3 each in compensation. Since 1986, over 47 ALCOA facilities in the US have been fined for environmental violations, the most notable being a $3.75 million penalty for pollutant discharge into the St. Lawrence River.
Global demand for aluminum is steadily rising with the US being one of the largest consumers. Aluminum can be found in wrappers, cans, pots, and toasters, just to name a few. This demand is dependent upon bauxite importation from regions such as Juruti, which in turn depends on the exploitation of these local communities and environments. Companies like ALCOA are in part able to continue with these abuses under the guise of sustainability and sound environmental management; however, it is clear that not only is this a hollow illusion, but their impact on nature and communities has so far done more harm than good. Sustainability has become a big buzzword these days, but the international and environmental communities need to be more critical and thoughtful as to what it entails. As consumers with our inherent connection to the extraction and importation of raw materials, we can start by being cautious of where our everyday products-such as all things aluminum-come from, and especially at what cost, even if it does happen to be an ocean away.